Composite Bows of the High Middle Ages from Rock Burials in Mongolia
https://doi.org/10.25205/2499-9997-2025-1-123-134
Abstract
The article examines composite bows of Central Asian nomads from the rock burials of Mongolia in the 11th – 14th centuries. Descriptions of five bow specimens with preserved kibiti are presented. The collected materials allow us to identify some trends in the evolution of composite bows of the region in question. Among other things, it was found that during the period in question, the inner side of the bow limbs began to be increasingly equipped with horn pads, which worked better than wood in compression. In addition, the horn shoulder pads served as a damping spring, which allowed the bow to more effectively return to its original shape after firing. Certain changes occurred in the design of the kibiti. If the limbs of earlier bows had a predominantly flattened cross-section, now it changes to a more rounded one, in some cases D-shaped. Such bows could be stored in a bow case in a combat position (with a stretched bowstring) for a long time, and were more effectively used when shooting heavy arrows with a wide, massive feather. Bone overlays on the ends of the bow are used less and less in the 13th – 14th centuries, and the transition zones become more pronounced. In addition, early versions of bowstring rests appear in the Mongolian era. Certain changes also occur in the design of weapons. For example, Central Asian craftsmen stop pasting birch bark or leather on the inside of the bow kibiti. Thus, during the period under consideration, a special type of composite bow is formed, which, over time, will become dominant in the sadachny sets of the peoples of Mongolia, Manchuria, Sayan-Altai and the Baikal region.
About the Author
D. I. ProninRussian Federation
Daniil I. Pronin, Bachelor
References
1. Bobrov L. A. Takticheskii priem “khorovod” v voennom iskusstve kochevnikov Velikoi stepi XIII–XVI vv. [The tactical device “round dance” in the military art of the nomads of the Great Steppe of the 13 th – 16th centuries]. Srednevekovye tyurko-tatarskie gosudarstva [Medieval Turkic-Tatar states], 2016, no. 8, pp. 73–83. (in Russ.)
2. Bobrov L. A., Khudyakov Yu. S. Vooruzhenie i taktika kochevnikov Tsentral'noi Azii i Yuzhnoi Sibiri v epokhu pozdnego Srednevekov'ya i rannego Novogo vremeni (XV – pervaya polovina XVIII v.) [Armament and tactics of the nomads of Central Asia and Southern Siberia in the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Times (15th – the first half of the 18 th century)]. St. Petersburg, SPbSU Press, 2008, 782 p. (in Russ.)
3. Bobrov L. A., Salnikov A. V. Takticheskii priem “tulgama” v voennom iskusstve mongolov XIII v. [Tactical method of “tulgama” in the military art of the Mongols of the 13th century]. Bylye gody [The old days], 2015, no. 4, pp. 786–797. (in Russ.)
4. Gorbunov V. V. Voennoe delo naseleniya Altaya v III–XIV vv. [Military affairs of the Altai population in the 3 rd – 14th centuries]. Barnaul, AltSU Press, 2006, 233 p. (in Russ.)
5. Khudyakov Yu. S. Vooruzhenie kochevnikov Yuzhnoi Sibiri i Tsentral'noi Azii v epokhu razvitogo Srednevekov'ya [Armament of the nomads of Southern Siberia and Central Asia in the era of the advanced Middle Ages]. Ed. by V. E. Medvedev. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 1997, 159 p. (in Russ.)
6. Erdenebat U. Altmongolisches Grabbrauchtum: Archäologisch -historische Untersuchungen zu den mongolischen Grabfunden des 11. bis 17. Jahrhunderts in der Mongolei. Dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. Bonn, 2009, 262 S.
7. Amartүvshin Ch., Batdalaj B. Hagtyn hadny orshuulga. Nүүdelchdijn өv sudlal, 2020, vol. 21-2, Fasc-11. UB, pp. 110–127. (in Mong.)
8. Mongolyn hadny orshuulgyn dursgal. XIII Bot'. Ulaanbaatar, 2022, 297 p. (in Mong.)
9. Tselkhagarav Ts., Bemmann Y., Torbat Ts. Yolyn hadny orshuulga. In: Arkheologiin sudlal Bot XXXIX, devter 1–17. Ulaanbaatar, 2020, pp. 170–184. (in Mong.)
Review
For citations:
Pronin D.I. Composite Bows of the High Middle Ages from Rock Burials in Mongolia. Universum Humanitarium. 2025;(1):123-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2499-9997-2025-1-123-134